- Reusable elements, components, and templates.
- Deliver task automation.
- Allow customizing code and debugging.
- Improves developers’ productivity.
- Reduce the burden of long-term coding, hence making development procedures simpler for developers.
Image Source: Monterail.com
Pros of Vue.js:
- Easy to learn.
- Developer Friendly.
- Easy to download.
- Requires a few lines of coding to develop a Vue app.
- It works excellent with components.
- Offers ease of integration.
- Allows two-way communication.
- It is an ideal option for a project that needs real-time updates.
- Plugin-based architecture.
- The structure of the framework is very intuitive.
- Easy to track the blocks if any bugs appear.
- Instant prototyping and PWA support.
Cons of Vue.js::
- Sometimes its vast options can create confusion in the developer’s mind, particularly in a big project.
- The majority of people will find difficulty in availing the support. However, it is fast-evolving but has a small community. The community holds maximum Chinese-speaking people because of which complicates things for English-speaking developers.
2. Angular Framework
Pros of Angular
- Deal with two-way data binding.
- Allow excellent user accessibility.
- Reduces the CPUs burden.
- Load quickly
- Removes dependencies on external plugins.
- Needs less coding.
Cons of Angular
- One of the significant downsides to using Angular is it has some restrictions for SEO practice.
- Helpless in providing accessibility to web search engine crawlers.
- An angular framework is very well hard to learn. It holds quite an unpredictable trap of modules, various components, coding exercises, and customizing powers, unquestionably taking some time to learn.
Luckily, Angular offers tremendous help and support. There are various online instructional exercises and courses you can take to explore all the features.
3. React Framework
It is probably becoming an ideal selection of designers. It permits developers to make reusable UI components, ultimately helping in speeding the development processes.
One of the software engineers at Facebook named Jordan Walke created ReactJS. It was made open source in 2013, and from that only day, this JS library is starting to get recognition for supporting financial specialists’ business achievements.
Indeed, you get a lot of advantages when you use ReactJS in your activities. Directly expanding efficiency and shortening improvement time to decreasing web development and upkeep cost and creating more normalized yield are a portion of the upper hands of ReactJS.
Pros of React
- With regards to picking the correct framework for your task, the principal thing a designer or financial specialist searches for is its ease of use – regardless of whether the system is anything but difficult to learn and simple to utilize or not. React is engaged and simple-to-learn
- It is upheld by a stable network, strong community( Facebook, Instagram, and engineers ’ external team).
- SEO friendly.
- Ensures the fastest rendering; it uses Virtual DOM.
- JSX makes components/blocks code readable. It gives you access to see how components are combined.
- Use React Native tool for app development activities like testing and debugging.
- Allows the reuse of code components.
Cons of React
- It is essential to have Build Tools.
- The chances of the framework being incompatible with the other libraries and code that modifies DOM is very high.
- Poor documentation.
The thought to use Node.js gives you the accessibility of event-driven I/O. This helps to stay productive and lightweight at the season of development of information-concentrated continuous applications, which work over a progression of dispersed gadgets.
Pros of Nodejs
- The non-obstructing IO ecosystem system allows designers to process various requests at the same time.
- Node.js designers network is very dynamic, which means acknowledgment of easy-to-use codes in GitHub.
Cons of Node Js
- It allows the occurrences of Node API instability.
- It doesn’t uphold multi-threaded programming, which implies it isn’t ideal when performing long-running figurines, which at last prompts a decrease in application execution.
Pros of Ember.js:
- Efficient to work as everything is well-organized.
- One of the quickest frameworks.
- Two-way data binding.
- Legitimate documentation.
Cons of Ember.js:
- A little network, less mainstream.
- Complex sentence structure and moderate updates.
- A hard expectation to hold data.
- Weighty framework for little applications
Pros of Next.js:
- Simple file system routing.
- Automatic code splitting.
Cons of Next.js:
- Issues in CRA.
Mithril.js has a progression of comparative features as React.js. Mithril offers you progressive MVC components and different protected course formats that accompany sharp DOM contrasts that check elite rendering.
Pros of Mithril.js
- Simple to learn
- Its loading times are quick. The templates are assembled first and afterward served to the program.
- Uses a virtual DOM.
- The API is gorgeous, a little contrasted with different frameworks.
Cons of Mithril.js
The lightweight Polymer.js intends to empower you to exploit the Web Components.
The polymer has web segments, which are HTML norms that guarantee more prolonged presence when contrasted with ReactJS.
Pros of Polymer.js:
- It is quick and 3X times faster on Chrome browser, whereas 4X faster on Safari.
- A vast number of themes and designs.
- It delivers new functionality like Shadow DOM that allows the encapsulation of CSS.
Cons of Polymer.js:
- Reliance mistakes and highlighting an alternate variant of conditions.
- Downloading the whole library and Polyfills.
- Absence of server-side rendering.
Utilizing Backbone, you can make single-page applications with the assistance of conventional web libraries. They are created on the possibility that the server-side functionalities ought to stream employing API consistently. It limits the number of codes that should be formed to accomplish the mind-boggling functionalities of complex web application systems.
Pros of Backbone.js:
- Simple to learn.
- Lightweight structure.
Cons of Backbone.js:
- Gives essential devices to make the application structure (the system doesn’t give a readymade structure).
- Need to compose standard code to impart for a view to display and demonstrate to see.
Aurelia likewise accompanies an extensible HTML compiler, which lets the designers make altered HTML components and assume responsibility for layout age with dynamic stacking, information official, and grouped rendering.
Pros of Aurelia.js:
- It’s itself coordinated towards web principles, so you will consistently keep updated with present-day ideas.
- It is exceptionally lightweight, knowledgeable, and ready to help inside the short notification.
- It is collaborative towards the designers’ experience. It spares you bunches of time.
- You can add or eliminate any tools.
- It has a basic structure, which makes the framework speedier and simpler to learn.
- It rushes to arrange and set it up for use.
Cons of Aurelia.js:
- There are no significant obstacles.
Also Read: 10 Best PHP frameworks for web developers
Frequently Asked Questions
- Vue JS
- React JS
- Node JS
- Ember JS
Is React JS the most loved JS Web Framework?
Yes, it is right to yes that React Js most loved JS Web Framework. According to a survey conducted by Stack Overflow in 2019., it was found that 74.5% of developers love using React JS.
Whereas, in most wanted JS framework categories, there is a tough competition between React and Vue. Although, here also React is leading.
For the purpose of web development, you can start learning Angular, React, NodeJS.